AppBreakup

PocketBase vs Supabase

Updated October 2026 · AppBreakup editorial

PocketBase logo

PocketBase

An open-source backend in a single Go binary, with SQLite, auth, file storage and realtime.

Open sourceSelf-hostable
Supabase logo

Supabase

Hosted Postgres with auth, storage, realtime and edge functions bundled into one open-source backend.

Free plan + paidOpen sourceSelf-hostable

The short answer

PocketBase suits solo developers and small apps that want a full backend in one executable on a cheap server, with nothing else to operate. Supabase suits projects that need Postgres, room to grow, a managed cloud and a company behind it. The biggest difference is scale and support: PocketBase is a single-server SQLite tool run by volunteers, while Supabase is a hosted platform with paid plans and support.

PocketBase or Supabase: our take

PocketBase packs an embedded SQLite database, authentication with OAuth providers, file storage, realtime subscriptions and an admin dashboard into one binary. You download it, run it on any server, and get a REST API with access rules set in the dashboard. Custom logic comes from using it as a Go framework or adding JavaScript hooks. Operations are minimal: no separate database server, no containers required, and backups are a matter of copying files. It is free and MIT-licensed.

Supabase gives each project a dedicated Postgres database and surrounds it with auth, storage, realtime, auto-generated REST and GraphQL APIs, edge functions and vector search. Postgres brings SQL, row-level security and a large extension ecosystem, and you can leave with a standard dump. It is open source under Apache-2.0 and self-hostable with Docker, though running the full stack yourself takes real work, which is why most people use the managed cloud.

The limits matter when choosing. PocketBase scales only vertically on a single server, supports only SQLite, has no hosted cloud or paid support, and has not reached version 1.0, so upgrades can include breaking changes. Supabase's free plan is $0/month for 2 active projects, which pause after 1 week of inactivity, and Pro starts from $25/month plus usage charges that can be hard to predict.

Choose PocketBase for side projects, internal tools and small apps where a single server is plenty and you value simplicity over everything else. Choose Supabase if you expect growth, need Postgres features, work in a team, or want someone else to run the infrastructure.

Which should you pick?

Choose PocketBase if…

  • Solo developers and small apps that want a full backend on one cheap server
  • You need Linux, macOS and Windows, which Supabase doesn't list
  • One binary with no external database or dependencies
  • Built-in admin dashboard, auth and realtime

Choose Supabase if…

  • Developers who want Postgres plus auth, storage and realtime without running servers
  • You need Web, which PocketBase doesn't list
  • Real Postgres underneath, so SQL, extensions and standard tooling all work
  • Auth, storage, realtime and functions in one dashboard

About each app

What is PocketBase?

PocketBase packs a complete small-app backend into one executable: an embedded SQLite database, user authentication with OAuth providers, file storage, realtime subscriptions and an admin dashboard. You download the binary, run it on any cheap server and you have a REST API with access rules defined in the dashboard. It can also be used as a Go framework, or extended with JavaScript hooks, when you need custom logic. The appeal is how little there is to operate: no separate database server, no containers required, and backups are a matter of copying files. The limits are deliberate. It scales only vertically on a single server, supports only SQLite, and is a volunteer-run personal project with no company, paid support or hosted cloud behind it, and it has not yet reached version 1.0. It is free and MIT-licensed, and runs on Linux, macOS and Windows servers.

What is Supabase?

Supabase gives every project a dedicated Postgres database and wraps it with the pieces most apps need: user authentication, file storage, realtime subscriptions, auto-generated REST and GraphQL APIs, edge functions and vector search. Because the core is plain Postgres, you can use SQL, row-level security policies, extensions and any Postgres client, and you can leave with a standard database dump. It is the most common choice for people who want a Firebase-style developer experience without a proprietary NoSQL store, and many AI app builders use it as their default backend. The whole stack is open source and can be self-hosted with Docker, although the self-hosted version needs more care than the managed cloud. Pricing starts with a free tier for small projects, which pauses inactive projects, then a monthly Pro plan per organisation with usage-based charges for compute, storage, egress and monthly active users. Team and Enterprise plans add SSO, compliance and support. Everything is managed from a web dashboard and a CLI.

Side by side

AttributePocketBaseSupabase
PricingOpen sourceFree plan + paid
Open sourceYesYes
Self-hostableYesYes
PlatformsSelf-hosted, Linux, macOS, WindowsWeb, Self-hosted
Best forSolo developers and small apps that want a full backend on one cheap serverDevelopers who want Postgres plus auth, storage and realtime without running servers
StatusActiveActive

Verified facts, compared

Facts both apps publish, checked on each vendor's own site.

FactPocketBaseSupabase
LicenseMITApache-2.0

PocketBase vs Supabase pricing

PocketBase: open source

Supabase: free plan + paid

  • Free plan: $0/month, 2 active projects source
  • Pro plan: From $25/month source
  • Free project pausing: After 1 week of inactivity source
  • License: Apache-2.0 source
Supabase pricing page

Platforms

PlatformPocketBaseSupabase
Web
Windows
macOS
Linux
Self-hosted

PocketBase facts

4 of 4 verified
License
MIT
Checked Oct 25, 2026github.com(opens source in a new tab)
“License: MIT (MIT License).”
Hosting
Self-hosted only
Checked Oct 25, 2026pocketbase.io(opens source in a new tab)
“PocketBase is self-hosted only.”
Database
Embedded SQLite
Checked Oct 25, 2026pocketbase.io(opens source in a new tab)
“PocketBase uses embedded SQLite (in WAL mode) and there are no plans for supporting other databases.”
Scaling
Single server (vertical) only
Checked Oct 25, 2026pocketbase.io(opens source in a new tab)
“Does it scale? Only on a single server, aka.”

Supabase facts

4 of 4 verified
Free plan
$0/month, 2 active projects
Checked Oct 25, 2026supabase.com(opens source in a new tab)
“Start for Free $ 0 / month”
Pro plan
From $25/month
Checked Oct 25, 2026supabase.com(opens source in a new tab)
“Pro Most Popular For production applications with the power to scale. Get Started From $ 25 / month First project included.”
Free project pausing
After 1 week of inactivity
Checked Oct 25, 2026supabase.com(opens source in a new tab)
“Free projects are paused after 1 week of inactivity.”
License
Apache-2.0
Checked Oct 25, 2026github.com(opens source in a new tab)
“License: Apache-2.0 (Apache License 2.0).”

Pros and cons of PocketBase

  • One binary with no external database or dependencies
  • Built-in admin dashboard, auth and realtime
  • Free and MIT-licensed
  • Easy to back up and move between servers
  • Scales only on a single server
  • SQLite only, with no plans for other databases
  • No company, hosted cloud or paid support behind it
  • Pre-1.0, so upgrades can include breaking changes
More PocketBase alternatives

Pros and cons of Supabase

  • Real Postgres underneath, so SQL, extensions and standard tooling all work
  • Auth, storage, realtime and functions in one dashboard
  • Open source and self-hostable with Docker
  • Large community and many framework guides
  • Free projects pause after a week of inactivity
  • Usage charges for compute and egress can be hard to predict
  • Self-hosting the full stack takes real operations work
More Supabase alternatives

Other apps to consider

  • Appwrite logo
    Appwrite

    Instead of PocketBase

    Self-hosted backend with more services and a company behind it, at the cost of a heavier stack.

  • Firebase logo
    Firebase

    Instead of PocketBase

    Fully managed and globally scaled if you no longer want to run your own server.

  • Parse Platform logo
    Parse Platform

    Instead of PocketBase

    Mature open-source backend server that runs on MongoDB or Postgres and scales horizontally.

  • Nhost logo
    Nhost

    Instead of Supabase

    Also Postgres-based, but with a GraphQL-first API generated by Hasura.

  • Neon logo
    Neon

    Instead of Supabase

    Serverless Postgres with branching, if you mainly need the database and handle auth elsewhere.

  • Convex logo
    Convex

    Instead of Supabase

    A TypeScript-first reactive backend if you would rather write queries as code than SQL.

PocketBase vs Supabase: common questions

Is PocketBase better than Supabase?

PocketBase suits solo developers and small apps that want a full backend in one executable on a cheap server, with nothing else to operate. Supabase suits projects that need Postgres, room to grow, a managed cloud and a company behind it. The biggest difference is scale and support: PocketBase is a single-server SQLite tool run by volunteers, while Supabase is a hosted platform with paid plans and support.

Is PocketBase free?

Yes. PocketBase is free, open-source software you can host yourself.

Is Supabase free?

Supabase has a free plan, with paid plans for more features. See its verified pricing facts above for current limits.

Is PocketBase or Supabase open source?

Both are open source.

Which platforms do PocketBase and Supabase support?

PocketBase: Self-hosted, Linux, macOS and Windows. Supabase: Web and Self-hosted.