Quick comparison
| # | App | Pricing | Verified price | Open source | Platforms | Verified facts | Score |
|---|
| 1 | Kong | Open source | From $25/month plus usage (Konnect Plus) | Yes | Web, Linux, Self-hosted | 4 of 4 | 68.8 |
| 2 | Tyk | Open source | — | Yes | Web, Linux, Self-hosted | 4 of 4 | 64.8 |
| 3 | WSO2 API Manager | Open source | — | Yes | Web, Self-hosted | 6 of 6 | 40.0 |
1
1. KongTop pick
Best for: Platform teams wanting a battle-tested open-source gateway with an optional managed control plane
Open sourceSelf-hostableWeb, Linux, Self-hosted
Why switch from Apigee
Open-source core you can run anywhere, with plugin-based policies instead of Apigee's XML.
Pros
- Open-source core under Apache 2.0
- Large plugin library for auth, rate limiting and observability
- Self-hosted, hybrid or fully managed deployment
Cons
- Many advanced plugins and the portal need a paid licence
- Konnect usage pricing has many moving parts
- More to operate than a single-binary gateway like KrakenD
How this score is calculated
Editorial fit ×0.3100
Reviews ×0.363
Clicks (90 days) ×0.150
Freshness ×0.15100
Votes ×0.150
0 counted reviews, 0 up and 0 down votes. Full formula
2
Best for: Teams in regulated industries wanting an open-source gateway they can fully self-manage
Open sourceSelf-hostableWeb, Linux, Self-hosted
Why switch from Apigee
Open-source gateway with a developer portal and dashboard, self-hosted or as a managed cloud.
Pros
- Gateway is open source under MPL 2.0
- Paid plans don't charge per API call
- Cloud, hybrid or fully on-premises deployment
Cons
- Dashboard and developer portal require a paid licence
- Cloud trial is only 48 hours
- Smaller plugin ecosystem than Kong
How this score is calculated
Editorial fit ×0.387
Reviews ×0.363
Clicks (90 days) ×0.150
Freshness ×0.15100
Votes ×0.150
0 counted reviews, 0 up and 0 down votes. Full formula
3
Best for: Enterprises wanting full open-source API management they can host on their own infrastructure
Open sourceSelf-hostableWeb, Self-hosted
Why switch from Apigee
Open-source and self-hostable, avoiding cloud lock-in while keeping a full management suite.
Pros
- Apache 2.0 open source with a complete feature set
- Runs on-prem, in Kubernetes, hybrid or as SaaS
- Control plane can govern Kong, AWS, Azure and Envoy gateways
- Includes AI gateway and MCP server generation
Cons
- Large Java-based platform with a steep setup and operations load
- Production support and managed cloud are paid extras
- Heavier than lightweight gateways for simple routing needs
How this score is calculated
Editorial fit ×0.312
Reviews ×0.363
Clicks (90 days) ×0.150
Freshness ×0.1585
Votes ×0.150
0 counted reviews, 0 up and 0 down votes. Full formula
Verified facts
6 of 6 verified- Open source
- Yes, self-hosted
- Checked Nov 8, 2026wso2.com(opens source in a new tab)
- Deployment
- On-prem, Kubernetes, hybrid or managed cloud
- Checked Nov 8, 2026wso2.com(opens source in a new tab)
- Web portals
- Open source (Apache-2.0)
- Checked Nov 8, 2026github.com(opens source in a new tab)
- Multi-gateway
- WSO2, Kong, AWS, Azure, Envoy
- Checked Nov 8, 2026wso2.com(opens source in a new tab)