AppBreakup
Submit an app

GitHub Actions alternatives: 6 apps ranked by verified data

Facts checked Oct 25, 2026AppBreakup editorialHow we rank

Common reasons people leave GitHub Actions: hosted runners are slower than specialist providers, and YAML workflows get hard to debug at scale. We ranked 6 alternatives by how directly each one replaces GitHub Actions, then by reviews, real visits and how recently each app's facts were checked against its own website. GitLab currently ranks first.

Quick comparison

#AppPricingOpen sourcePlatformsVerified factsScore
1GitLab logoGitLabFree plan + paidYesWeb, Self-hosted4 of 466.5
2CircleCI logoCircleCIFree plan + paidNoWeb, Self-hosted4 of 462.6
3Buildkite logoBuildkiteFree plan + paidNoWeb, Self-hosted4 of 459.6
4Blacksmith logoBlacksmithFree plan + paidNoWeb4 of 457.2
5Depot logoDepotPaidNoWeb4 of 455.3
  1. GitLab logo

    1. GitLabTop pick

    Best for: Organisations wanting code, CI/CD and security in one tool, often self-managed

    Free plan + paidOpen sourceSelf-hostableWeb, Self-hosted

    66.5

    score / 100

    Why switch from GitHub Actions

    Mature built-in CI/CD with a stronger pipeline model and self-managed runners.

    Pros

    • Very capable built-in CI/CD
    • Free self-managed Community Edition
    • One product covering most of the delivery lifecycle

    Cons

    • Dense interface with many features
    • Key features locked to expensive tiers
    • Free hosted tier is limited to 5 users per group
    Visit GitLab Details and reviews
    How this score is calculated
    Editorial fit ×0.3100
    Reviews ×0.363
    Clicks (90 days) ×0.150
    Freshness ×0.1585
    Votes ×0.150

    0 counted reviews, 0 up and 0 down votes. Full formula

    Is GitLab a good GitHub Actions alternative?

    Verified facts

    4 of 4 verified
    Free plan
    $0, 5 users per group
    Checked Oct 25, 2026about.gitlab.com(opens source in a new tab)
    Free compute minutes
    400/month
    Checked Oct 25, 2026about.gitlab.com(opens source in a new tab)
    Premium plan
    $29 per user/month (billed annually)
    Checked Oct 25, 2026about.gitlab.com(opens source in a new tab)
    Premium compute minutes
    10,000/month
    Checked Oct 25, 2026about.gitlab.com(opens source in a new tab)
  2. CircleCI logo

    2. CircleCI

    Best for: Teams with large test suites that want faster builds and better insight than built-in CI

    Free plan + paidSelf-hostableWeb, Self-hosted

    62.6

    score / 100

    Why switch from GitHub Actions

    Dedicated CI with faster machines, better caching and test insights.

    Pros

    • Wide choice of machine types including macOS and GPU
    • Test splitting, caching and insights for speed
    • Works with GitHub, GitLab and Bitbucket

    Cons

    • Credit-based pricing takes effort to predict
    • Separate tool from your code host
    • Config can get complex with orbs and anchors
    Visit CircleCI Compare with GitHub ActionsDetails and reviews
    How this score is calculated
    Editorial fit ×0.387
    Reviews ×0.363
    Clicks (90 days) ×0.150
    Freshness ×0.1585
    Votes ×0.150

    0 counted reviews, 0 up and 0 down votes. Full formula

    Is CircleCI a good GitHub Actions alternative?

    Verified facts

    4 of 4 verified
    Free plan
    Up to 6,000 build minutes/month
    Checked Oct 25, 2026circleci.com(opens source in a new tab)
    Free plan users
    Up to 5 active users
    Checked Oct 25, 2026circleci.com(opens source in a new tab)
    Performance plan
    From $15/month
    Checked Oct 25, 2026circleci.com(opens source in a new tab)
    Included credits
    30,000 on Performance
    Checked Oct 25, 2026circleci.com(opens source in a new tab)
  3. Buildkite logo

    3. Buildkite

    Best for: Engineering teams with large build volumes who want builds on their own infrastructure

    Free plan + paidWeb, Self-hosted

    59.6

    score / 100

    Why switch from GitHub Actions

    Run pipelines on your own infrastructure with a hosted control plane.

    Pros

    • Builds run on your own machines, keeping code private
    • Scales to very high concurrency
    • Dynamic pipelines suit large monorepos

    Cons

    • You manage the agent infrastructure unless you pay for hosted agents
    • Per-user pricing adds up for big orgs
    • More setup than all-hosted CI
    Visit Buildkite Details and reviews
    How this score is calculated
    Editorial fit ×0.377
    Reviews ×0.363
    Clicks (90 days) ×0.150
    Freshness ×0.1585
    Votes ×0.150

    0 counted reviews, 0 up and 0 down votes. Full formula

    Is Buildkite a good GitHub Actions alternative?

    Verified facts

    4 of 4 verified
    Free plan
    $0 for solo developers and small teams
    Checked Oct 25, 2026buildkite.com(opens source in a new tab)
    Pro plan
    $30 per active user/month
    Checked Oct 25, 2026buildkite.com(opens source in a new tab)
    Free trial
    30 days, no card
    Checked Oct 25, 2026buildkite.com(opens source in a new tab)
    Self-hosted agents
    Yes
    Checked Oct 25, 2026buildkite.com(opens source in a new tab)
  4. Blacksmith logo

    4. Blacksmith

    Best for: Teams on GitHub Actions who want faster, cheaper runners with a one-line change

    Free plan + paidWeb

    57.2

    score / 100

    Why switch from GitHub Actions

    Drop-in faster runners for existing Actions workflows at lower per-minute cost.

    Pros

    • One-line switch from GitHub-hosted runners
    • Lower per-minute prices
    • Free monthly minutes

    Cons

    • Only works with GitHub Actions
    • Caching features are paid add-ons
    • Adds a third party with access to your builds
    Visit Blacksmith Details and reviews
    How this score is calculated
    Editorial fit ×0.369
    Reviews ×0.363
    Clicks (90 days) ×0.150
    Freshness ×0.1585
    Votes ×0.150

    0 counted reviews, 0 up and 0 down votes. Full formula

    Is Blacksmith a good GitHub Actions alternative?

    Verified facts

    4 of 4 verified
    Linux x64 price
    $0.004/min (2 vCPU)
    Checked Oct 25, 2026blacksmith.sh(opens source in a new tab)
    Free minutes
    3,000/month
    Checked Oct 25, 2026blacksmith.sh(opens source in a new tab)
    Docker layer caching
    $0.50/GB/month add-on
    Checked Oct 25, 2026blacksmith.sh(opens source in a new tab)
    Setup
    Drop-in replacement for GitHub runners
    Checked Oct 25, 2026blacksmith.sh(opens source in a new tab)
  5. Depot logo

    5. Depot

    Best for: Teams whose Docker builds and GitHub Actions runs are slow and costly

    PaidWeb

    55.3

    score / 100

    Why switch from GitHub Actions

    Faster Actions runners and container builds without rewriting workflows.

    Pros

    • Much faster Docker builds with shared cache
    • Drop-in faster GitHub Actions runners
    • Per-second billing

    Cons

    • No free plan beyond a trial
    • Another vendor alongside your CI
    • Mostly helps container-heavy workflows
    Visit Depot Details and reviews
    How this score is calculated
    Editorial fit ×0.363
    Reviews ×0.363
    Clicks (90 days) ×0.150
    Freshness ×0.1585
    Votes ×0.150

    0 counted reviews, 0 up and 0 down votes. Full formula

    Is Depot a good GitHub Actions alternative?

    Verified facts

    4 of 4 verified
    Developer plan
    $20/month
    Checked Oct 25, 2026depot.dev(opens source in a new tab)
    Startup plan
    $200/month
    Checked Oct 25, 2026depot.dev(opens source in a new tab)
    Free trial
    7 days
    Checked Oct 25, 2026depot.dev(opens source in a new tab)
    Developer plan Actions minutes
    2,000/month
    Checked Oct 25, 2026depot.dev(opens source in a new tab)

The best GitHub Actions alternative for…

The highest-ranked app in this list for each need.

GitLab logo

Best GitHub Actions alternative for most people

GitLab

Mature built-in CI/CD with a stronger pipeline model and self-managed runners.

Woodpecker CI logo

Best GitHub Actions alternative for a free option

Woodpecker CI

Free self-hosted CI that works with Gitea, Forgejo and GitHub.

CircleCI logo

Best GitHub Actions alternative for a free plan you can upgrade

CircleCI

Dedicated CI with faster machines, better caching and test insights.

GitLab logo

Best GitHub Actions alternative for open source

GitLab

Mature built-in CI/CD with a stronger pipeline model and self-managed runners.

GitLab logo

Best GitHub Actions alternative for self-hosting

GitLab

Mature built-in CI/CD with a stronger pipeline model and self-managed runners.

Woodpecker CI logo

Best GitHub Actions alternative for Linux

Woodpecker CI

Free self-hosted CI that works with Gitea, Forgejo and GitHub.

Buildkite logo

Best GitHub Actions alternative for working in the browser

Buildkite

Run pipelines on your own infrastructure with a hosted control plane.

GitHub Actions alternatives: common questions

What is the best alternative to GitHub Actions?

GitLab ranks first right now. Mature built-in CI/CD with a stronger pipeline model and self-managed runners. CircleCI and Buildkite follow it in our ranking.

Is there a free alternative to GitHub Actions?

Yes. GitLab (free plan + paid), CircleCI (free plan + paid), Buildkite (free plan + paid) and Blacksmith (free plan + paid) have a free option. Check each app's verified facts for current plan limits.

Is there an open-source alternative to GitHub Actions?

Yes: GitLab and Woodpecker CI. GitLab and Woodpecker CI can also be self-hosted.

Which GitHub Actions alternatives work on Linux?

Woodpecker CI runs on Linux.

Why do people switch from GitHub Actions?

The complaints we hear most: hosted runners are slower than specialist providers; YAML workflows get hard to debug at scale; only works with GitHub-hosted code.

How is this list ranked?

Every app is scored with the same published formula: how directly it replaces GitHub Actions, reviews (weighted by verification), visits from AppBreakup, how recently its facts were checked against its own website, and reader votes.