Quick comparison
| # | App | Pricing | Verified price | Open source | Platforms | Verified facts | Score |
|---|
| 1 | ZAP | Open source | — | Yes | Windows, macOS, Linux | 4 of 4 | 68.8 |
| 2 | sqlmap | Open source | — | Yes | Windows, macOS, Linux | 4 of 4 | 59.4 |
1
1. ZAPTop pick
Best for: Developers and AppSec teams who want free automated web scanning, including in CI
Open sourceWindows, macOS, Linux
Why switch from Nikto
Free open-source scanner and proxy that also crawls and actively tests the application itself.
Pros
- Free and open source, with the automated scanner included
- Docker images and automation framework for CI pipelines
- Add-on marketplace extends it
Cons
- Interface is dated and busier than Burp or Caido
- Windows and Linux builds need Java 17 or newer installed
- Releases are unsigned, so operating systems show warnings on install
How this score is calculated
Editorial fit ×0.3100
Reviews ×0.363
Clicks (90 days) ×0.150
Freshness ×0.15100
Votes ×0.150
0 counted reviews, 0 up and 0 down votes. Full formula
2
Best for: Pentesters and security teams confirming and measuring SQL injection risk during authorised tests
Open sourceWindows, macOS, Linux
Why switch from Nikto
Free tool for the next step: confirming and exploiting SQL injection Nikto can't test.
Pros
- Free and open source under GPLv2
- Supports 40+ database backends and five injection techniques
- Goes beyond detection to show real impact through enumeration and data extraction
- Extensive documentation covering every option
Cons
- Command line only, no graphical interface
- Only covers SQL injection, not other web vulnerability classes
- Can be noisy and heavy on target systems if options aren't tuned
How this score is calculated
Editorial fit ×0.369
Reviews ×0.363
Clicks (90 days) ×0.150
Freshness ×0.15100
Votes ×0.150
0 counted reviews, 0 up and 0 down votes. Full formula