Quick comparison # App Pricing Verified price Open source Platforms Verified facts Score 1 Fo FossilOpen source — Yes Windows, macOS, Linux +1 5 of 5 74.4 2 MercurialOpen source — Yes Windows, macOS, Linux 4 of 4 61.8 3 Perforce P4Free plan + paid $39 per user/month (Cloud, billed monthly) No Windows, macOS, Linux +1 6 of 6 57.5 4 Unity Version ControlFree plan + paid — No Windows, macOS, Linux +1 6 of 6 55.9 5 Jujutsu (jj)Open source — Yes Windows, macOS, Linux 5 of 5 54.5
1 Fo Best for: Small teams and solo developers who want code, tickets and wiki in one self-hosted file
Open source Self-hostable Windows, macOS, Linux, Self-hosted
Why switch from CVS (Concurrent Versions System)
Single-file distributed VCS with built-in wiki and bug tracker, easy to self-host.
Pros Bug tracker, wiki, forum and web UI built into the repository Single executable and SQLite storage make install and backup easy Light enough to self-host on a cheap VPS or Raspberry Pi Permissive 2-clause BSD licenceCons Small community and few third-party tools or integrations Mainstream code hosts only support it through a Git mirror Deliberately limits history rewriting, which Git users may missHow this score is calculated Editorial fit ×0.3 69
Reviews ×0.3 63
Clicks (90 days) ×0.15 100
Freshness ×0.15 100
Votes ×0.1 50
0 counted reviews, 0 up and 0 down votes. Full formula
2 Best for: Teams that want distributed version control with a simpler, safer command line than Git
Open source Windows, macOS, Linux
Why switch from CVS (Concurrent Versions System)
Distributed like Git but with a simpler command set that CVS users find familiar.
Pros Consistent, smaller command set that is easier to learn Powerful features stay opt-in through extensions Full local history makes most operations fast and offline Free software under the GPLv2 or laterCons GitHub and GitLab.com don't host Mercurial repositories Far smaller ecosystem of GUIs, integrations and tutorials than Git Fewer developers already know it, so onboarding takes more effortHow this score is calculated Editorial fit ×0.3 77
Reviews ×0.3 63
Clicks (90 days) ×0.15 0
Freshness ×0.15 100
Votes ×0.1 50
0 counted reviews, 0 up and 0 down votes. Full formula
3 Best for: Game and media studios versioning large binary assets with locking and fine-grained access control
Free plan + paid Windows, macOS, Linux, Self-hosted
Why switch from CVS (Concurrent Versions System)
Keeps CVS's central-server model with file locking, but scales to huge repositories and binary assets.
Pros Handles very large repos and binary files well Exclusive file locking prevents asset overwrites Native integrations with Unreal Engine, Unity and Visual StudioCons Paid licences beyond five users, priced through sales Needs a central server to run or a paid hosted plan Workflow and tooling differ from the Git ecosystem most developers knowHow this score is calculated Editorial fit ×0.3 63
Reviews ×0.3 63
Clicks (90 days) ×0.15 0
Freshness ×0.15 100
Votes ×0.1 50
0 counted reviews, 0 up and 0 down votes. Full formula
4 Best for: Small and mid-size game studios that want artist-friendly version control for big assets
Free plan + paid Windows, macOS, Linux, Self-hosted
Why switch from CVS (Concurrent Versions System)
Centralised workflow with file locking that suits artists, plus optional distributed branches, aimed at game teams.
Pros Free tier with three seats to start Separate workflows for programmers and artists in one repo Cloud-hosted or on-premises deploymentCons Per-seat and storage charges grow as the team grows Smaller ecosystem and user base than Git outside games Product direction depends on Unity's wider businessHow this score is calculated Editorial fit ×0.3 57
Reviews ×0.3 63
Clicks (90 days) ×0.15 0
Freshness ×0.15 100
Votes ×0.1 50
0 counted reviews, 0 up and 0 down votes. Full formula
5 Best for: Developers who want a simpler, safer workflow while still pushing to Git hosts
Open source Windows, macOS, Linux
Why switch from CVS (Concurrent Versions System)
A modern VCS with simple commands and an undo log that stores repos in Git format, so they work with GitHub and other Git hosts.
Pros Works on existing Git repos, so teammates don't have to switch Operation log makes any command undoable Conflicts can be recorded and resolved later instead of blocking a rebase Free and Apache 2.0 licensedCons Command-line only, with GUI support coming from third-party tools No Git submodule or Git LFS support yet New concepts take time to learn for long-time Git usersHow this score is calculated Editorial fit ×0.3 53
Reviews ×0.3 63
Clicks (90 days) ×0.15 0
Freshness ×0.15 100
Votes ×0.1 50
0 counted reviews, 0 up and 0 down votes. Full formula