Quick comparison # App Pricing Verified price Open source Platforms Verified facts Score 1 ClickHouseOpen source 30 days with $300 credits No Web, Linux, macOS +1 5 of 5 66.2 2 QuestDBOpen source — Yes Self-hosted, Linux, macOS +1 5 of 5 57.5 3 PrometheusOpen source — Yes Self-hosted, Linux, macOS +1 4 of 4 56.8 4 VictoriaMetricsOpen source From $200/month Yes Self-hosted, Linux, macOS +1 4 of 4 54.4
1 Best for: Engineering teams building real-time dashboards, observability or analytics over billions of rows
Open source Web, Linux, macOS, Self-hosted
Why switch from InfluxDB
Fast column-oriented analytics database that handles large time series and log workloads with SQL.
Pros Very fast aggregations over large tables, suited to live dashboards Apache 2.0 open source, so it can be self-hosted at no licence cost Strong compression keeps storage costs down Managed cloud option on AWS, Google Cloud and AzureCons Schema and table-engine choices need care to get good performance Updates, deletes and large joins are weaker than in general-purpose warehouses Self-hosting a cluster takes real operational workHow this score is calculated Editorial fit ×0.3 41
Reviews ×0.3 63
Clicks (90 days) ×0.15 100
Freshness ×0.15 100
Votes ×0.1 50
0 counted reviews, 0 up and 0 down votes. Full formula
2 Best for: Teams storing high-volume timestamped data who want to query it in plain SQL
Open source Self-hostable Self-hosted, Linux, macOS, Windows
Why switch from InfluxDB
Open-source time-series database that accepts InfluxDB line protocol but is queried in standard SQL.
Pros Apache 2.0 licence for the full single-node engine Standard SQL with time-series extensions instead of a custom query language Postgres wire protocol lets Grafana and Postgres drivers connect directly Takes InfluxDB-style line protocol, Kafka and Telegraf for ingestionCons Replication, high availability and access control need the paid Enterprise edition The open-source edition only has basic auth without encryption in transit Smaller ecosystem and fewer hosted options than InfluxDB or TimescaleDBHow this score is calculated Editorial fit ×0.3 63
Reviews ×0.3 63
Clicks (90 days) ×0.15 0
Freshness ×0.15 100
Votes ×0.1 50
0 counted reviews, 0 up and 0 down votes. Full formula
3 Best for: Engineers running Kubernetes or microservices who want the de facto standard for metrics
Open source Self-hostable Self-hosted, Linux, macOS, Windows
Why switch from InfluxDB
Free, pull-based metrics store that is the default choice for monitoring Kubernetes and cloud-native services.
Pros Industry-standard metrics format supported almost everywhere PromQL is expressive for alerts and analysis Simple single-binary deploymentCons No built-in long-term or clustered storage Metrics only, so logs and traces need other tools Basic UI, so you will want Grafana tooHow this score is calculated Editorial fit ×0.3 60
Reviews ×0.3 63
Clicks (90 days) ×0.15 0
Freshness ×0.15 100
Votes ×0.1 50
0 counted reviews, 0 up and 0 down votes. Full formula
4 Best for: Teams outgrowing Prometheus who want cheaper long-term metrics storage
Open source Self-hostable Self-hosted, Linux, macOS, Windows
Why switch from InfluxDB
Open source, Prometheus-compatible time series store known for low resource use at high scale.
Pros Uses far less memory and disk than many alternatives Drop-in compatible with Prometheus and Grafana Simple single-binary option, cluster when neededCons Some features are enterprise-only MetricsQL extensions can reduce portability Logs and traces products are newerHow this score is calculated Editorial fit ×0.3 52
Reviews ×0.3 63
Clicks (90 days) ×0.15 0
Freshness ×0.15 100
Votes ×0.1 50
0 counted reviews, 0 up and 0 down votes. Full formula