Quick comparison # App Pricing Verified price Open source Platforms Verified facts Score 1 Fo FossilOpen source — Yes Windows, macOS, Linux +1 5 of 5 79.8 2 MercurialOpen source — Yes Windows, macOS, Linux 4 of 4 68.8 3 Unity Version ControlFree plan + paid — No Windows, macOS, Linux +1 6 of 6 61.8 4 Pi PijulOpen source — Yes Linux, macOS, Windows 5 of 5 42.3 5 Sapling SCMOpen source — Yes macOS, Linux, Windows 5 of 5 42.3
1 Fo Best for: Small teams and solo developers who want code, tickets and wiki in one self-hosted file
Open source Self-hostable Windows, macOS, Linux, Self-hosted
Why switch from Jujutsu (jj)
Single-binary DVCS that bundles a wiki, tickets and web UI, if you don't need Git compatibility.
Pros Bug tracker, wiki, forum and web UI built into the repository Single executable and SQLite storage make install and backup easy Light enough to self-host on a cheap VPS or Raspberry Pi Permissive 2-clause BSD licenceCons Small community and few third-party tools or integrations Mainstream code hosts only support it through a Git mirror Deliberately limits history rewriting, which Git users may missHow this score is calculated Editorial fit ×0.3 87
Reviews ×0.3 63
Clicks (90 days) ×0.15 100
Freshness ×0.15 100
Votes ×0.1 50
0 counted reviews, 0 up and 0 down votes. Full formula
2 Best for: Teams that want distributed version control with a simpler, safer command line than Git
Open source Windows, macOS, Linux
Why switch from Jujutsu (jj)
Mature distributed VCS with a similarly friendly command set and extensions like changeset evolution.
Pros Consistent, smaller command set that is easier to learn Powerful features stay opt-in through extensions Full local history makes most operations fast and offline Free software under the GPLv2 or laterCons GitHub and GitLab.com don't host Mercurial repositories Far smaller ecosystem of GUIs, integrations and tutorials than Git Fewer developers already know it, so onboarding takes more effortHow this score is calculated Editorial fit ×0.3 100
Reviews ×0.3 63
Clicks (90 days) ×0.15 0
Freshness ×0.15 100
Votes ×0.1 50
0 counted reviews, 0 up and 0 down votes. Full formula
3 Best for: Small and mid-size game studios that want artist-friendly version control for big assets
Free plan + paid Windows, macOS, Linux, Self-hosted
Why switch from Jujutsu (jj)
Graphical VCS for game teams with big binary assets and file locking, which jj doesn't handle.
Pros Free tier with three seats to start Separate workflows for programmers and artists in one repo Cloud-hosted or on-premises deploymentCons Per-seat and storage charges grow as the team grows Smaller ecosystem and user base than Git outside games Product direction depends on Unity's wider businessHow this score is calculated Editorial fit ×0.3 77
Reviews ×0.3 63
Clicks (90 days) ×0.15 0
Freshness ×0.15 100
Votes ×0.1 50
0 counted reviews, 0 up and 0 down votes. Full formula
4 Pi Best for: Developers curious about patch-based version control with cleaner merges than three-way merge
Open source Linux, macOS, Windows
Why switch from Jujutsu (jj)
Patch-based model where conflicts are first-class and resolutions never need redoing.
Pros Changes commute, so cherry-picks and merges stay consistent Resolved conflicts stay resolved across branches Partial clones of large repositories Free software under GPL 2.0 or laterCons Still a 1.0 beta release Small ecosystem: few GUIs, hosts or CI integrations compared with Git No official Windows binaries; installation is mainly through CargoHow this score is calculated Editorial fit ×0.3 12
Reviews ×0.3 63
Clicks (90 days) ×0.15 0
Freshness ×0.15 100
Votes ×0.1 50
0 counted reviews, 0 up and 0 down votes. Full formula
5 Best for: Git users who work with stacks of small commits and want easier amend, undo and review flows
Open source macOS, Linux, Windows
Why switch from Jujutsu (jj)
Another Git-compatible client focused on stacked commits and easy undo, from Meta.
Pros Works with existing Git repositories and GitHub Stacked commits restack automatically after amends Undo, unamend and hide make mistakes easy to recover from Local web UI with drag-and-drop rebasingCons Server and virtual filesystem for huge repos are not public Git support may still have rough edges, per its own docs Design favours rebase-based, always-online workflowsHow this score is calculated Editorial fit ×0.3 12
Reviews ×0.3 63
Clicks (90 days) ×0.15 0
Freshness ×0.15 100
Votes ×0.1 50
0 counted reviews, 0 up and 0 down votes. Full formula