Quick comparison # App Pricing Verified price Open source Platforms Verified facts Score 1 ElementOpen source — Yes Web, Windows, macOS +4 4 of 4 63.2 2 DiscordFree plan + paid $2.99 a month (Nitro Basic) No Web, Windows, macOS +3 6 of 6 59.4 3 HalloyOpen source — Yes macOS, Windows, Linux 5 of 5 50.0 4 ZulipOpen source — Yes Web, Windows, macOS +4 2 of 3 49.9 5 KVIrcOpen source — Yes Windows, macOS, Linux 4 of 4 49.0
1 Best for: Communities and organisations that want open, federated, encrypted chat they can run themselves
Open source Self-hostable Web, Windows, macOS, Linux, iOS, Android, Self-hosted
Why switch from Textual
Matrix client with open, federated rooms, where many open-source communities moved from IRC channels.
Pros Federated: talk across servers, or host your own Encrypted by default for private chats Open source, with bridges to other networksCons More complex than mainstream messengers Key backup and device verification confuse newcomers Self-hosting a homeserver takes real admin workHow this score is calculated Editorial fit ×0.3 32
Reviews ×0.3 63
Clicks (90 days) ×0.15 100
Freshness ×0.15 100
Votes ×0.1 50
0 counted reviews, 0 up and 0 down votes. Full formula
2 Best for: Communities that want free voice and text chat
Free plan + paid Web, Windows, macOS, Linux, iOS, Android
Why switch from Textual
Where many communities that left IRC now gather, with voice, video and free cross-platform apps.
Pros Free with unlimited history Excellent voice channels Rich roles, bots and moderationCons Not built for enterprise compliance Consumer-style interface for workHow this score is calculated Editorial fit ×0.3 69
Reviews ×0.3 63
Clicks (90 days) ×0.15 0
Freshness ×0.15 100
Votes ×0.1 50
0 counted reviews, 0 up and 0 down votes. Full formula
3 Best for: People who want a fast, modern graphical IRC client with strong IRCv3 support on any desktop
Open source macOS, Windows, Linux
Why switch from Textual
Free, open-source IRC client for macOS, Windows and Linux with a modern interface and IRCv3 support.
Pros Native app on macOS, Windows and Linux Wide IRCv3 support, including chat history and read markers Works with soju and ZNC bouncers Free and open sourceCons Configuration is done by editing a TOML file No scripting language like mIRC or WeeChat No mobile appHow this score is calculated Editorial fit ×0.3 38
Reviews ×0.3 63
Clicks (90 days) ×0.15 0
Freshness ×0.15 100
Votes ×0.1 50
0 counted reviews, 0 up and 0 down votes. Full formula
4 Best for: Distributed teams that work asynchronously across time zones
Open source Self-hostable Web, Windows, macOS, Linux, iOS, Android, Self-hosted
Why switch from Textual
Open-source chat with topic-based threads, adopted by a number of projects that used to coordinate on IRC.
Pros Topic threads keep chat organized Open source and self-hostable Great for async workCons Topic model takes getting used to Fewer third-party integrationsHow this score is calculated Editorial fit ×0.3 49
Reviews ×0.3 63
Clicks (90 days) ×0.15 0
Freshness ×0.15 77
Votes ×0.1 50
0 counted reviews, 0 up and 0 down votes. Full formula
Verified facts 2 of 3 verified 5 Best for: People who want a free graphical IRC client with scripting on Windows, Mac or Linux
Open source Windows, macOS, Linux
Why switch from Textual
Free, open-source IRC client that runs on macOS as well as Windows and Linux, with scripting and themes.
Pros Graphical client on Windows, macOS and Linux Own scripting language and community addons Free and open sourceCons Busy interface with a very large number of settings Slow release pace with a small volunteer team macOS builds are less polished than Windows and Linux onesHow this score is calculated Editorial fit ×0.3 34
Reviews ×0.3 63
Clicks (90 days) ×0.15 0
Freshness ×0.15 100
Votes ×0.1 50
0 counted reviews, 0 up and 0 down votes. Full formula