Amazon API Gateway vs Kong
Updated November 2026 · AppBreakup editorial

Amazon API Gateway
AWS's managed service for publishing REST, HTTP and WebSocket APIs in front of AWS backends.

Kong
Open-source API and AI gateway with a plugin ecosystem and the Konnect cloud management platform.
The short answer
Amazon API Gateway suits teams building serverless or AWS-hosted backends who want a fully managed gateway billed per call. Kong suits platform teams that want an open-source gateway they can run anywhere, with an optional managed control plane. The biggest difference is lock-in: API Gateway only runs inside AWS, while Kong's Apache-2.0 core runs on Linux, Docker or Kubernetes in any environment.
Amazon API Gateway or Kong: our take
Amazon API Gateway is a managed AWS service with no servers to run. It offers REST APIs with usage plans, API keys, validation and caching, cheaper HTTP APIs for simple proxying, and WebSocket APIs. It plugs straight into Lambda, IAM, Cognito and CloudWatch, which makes it the default front door for serverless apps on AWS. Kong Gateway is an open-source gateway you deploy yourself, in front of services anywhere, and extend through a large plugin library for authentication, rate limiting, transformations and observability.
Pricing works very differently. API Gateway has no minimum fees and charges per call plus data out: $1.00 per million HTTP API calls and $3.50 per million REST API calls at the first volume tier, with a free tier of 1M REST + 1M HTTP calls/month for 12 months for new accounts. Kong's core costs nothing to self-host under Apache-2.0, while Konnect, the hosted control plane, starts from $25/month plus usage after a 30-day trial. Many advanced Kong plugins and the developer portal need a paid licence, and Konnect's usage pricing has many moving parts; API Gateway's costs and configuration also get complex at high volume.
On deployment, API Gateway is region-bound and AWS-only, and it has no polished developer portal out of the box. Kong can be self-hosted, run hybrid with a Kong-hosted control plane, or run fully managed, and Konnect adds a portal, analytics and a service catalog. The cost is that Kong is more to operate than a managed service.
Pick Amazon API Gateway if your backends live on AWS, especially Lambda, and you want pay-per-call pricing with nothing to maintain. Pick Kong if you run across clouds, on premises or on Kubernetes, want to avoid tying your gateway to one provider, or need the flexibility of plugins and your own code.
Which should you pick?
Choose Amazon API Gateway if…
- Teams building serverless or AWS-hosted backends who want pay-per-call APIs with no servers.
- No minimum fees; you pay per call and data out
- Tight integration with Lambda, IAM and Cognito
Choose Kong if…
- Platform teams wanting a battle-tested open-source gateway with an optional managed control plane
- You want open-source software
- You need to host it on your own servers
- You want a free option (Amazon API Gateway is paid only)
- You need Linux and Self-hosted, which Amazon API Gateway doesn't list
About each app
What is Amazon API Gateway?
Amazon API Gateway is AWS's fully managed service for creating and running APIs. It offers three API types: REST APIs with the fullest feature set (usage plans, API keys, request validation, caching), cheaper and faster HTTP APIs for simpler proxying, and WebSocket APIs for two-way real-time apps. It integrates directly with Lambda, other AWS services and any HTTP backend, and uses IAM, Cognito or custom Lambda authorizers for access control, with logs and metrics in CloudWatch. There are no servers to manage and no minimum fees; you pay per API call received plus data transferred out, with optional paid caching. New accounts get a free tier of one million REST and HTTP calls a month for up to 12 months. It suits teams already building on AWS, especially serverless apps. The trade-offs are that it only runs inside AWS, each API lives in one region, and a developer portal or monetization takes extra work.
What is Kong?
Kong Gateway is one of the most widely deployed API gateways. It runs in front of your services to route traffic and handle authentication, rate limiting, transformations, logging and monitoring, mostly through a large library of plugins that can be extended with your own code. The core gateway is open source under Apache 2.0 and can run on Linux, in Docker or on Kubernetes through its ingress controller. Kong Inc. builds commercial layers on top: Konnect, a hosted control plane with a developer portal, analytics and service catalog, plus enterprise plugins and an AI gateway for governing LLM and MCP traffic. Teams can self-host everything, run hybrid with Kong-hosted control planes, or use fully managed gateways. Konnect has a free trial and usage-based paid plans; enterprise pricing is by quote. It suits platform teams that want a proven gateway with room to grow into full API management.
Side by side
| Attribute | Amazon API Gateway | Kong |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing | Paid | Open source |
| Open source | No | Yes |
| Self-hostable | No | Yes |
| Platforms | Web | Web, Linux, Self-hosted |
| Best for | Teams building serverless or AWS-hosted backends who want pay-per-call APIs with no servers. | Platform teams wanting a battle-tested open-source gateway with an optional managed control plane |
| Status | Active | Active |
Amazon API Gateway vs Kong pricing
Amazon API Gateway: paid
- Free tier: 1M REST + 1M HTTP calls/month for 12 months source
- Free tier credits: Up to $200 for new AWS customers source
Kong: open source
- License: Apache-2.0 source
- Free trial: 30 days (Konnect) source
- Starting price: From $25/month plus usage (Konnect Plus) source
Platforms
| Platform | Amazon API Gateway | Kong |
|---|---|---|
| Web | ||
| Linux | ||
| Self-hosted |
Amazon API Gateway facts
6 of 6 verified- Pricing model
- Pay per API call, no minimum fees
- Checked Nov 8, 2026aws.amazon.com(opens source in a new tab)
- “There are no minimum fees or upfront commitments.”
- WebSocket APIs
- Yes
- Checked Nov 8, 2026aws.amazon.com(opens source in a new tab)
- “one million messages and 750,000 connection minutes for WebSocket APIs per month for up to 12 months .”
- HTTP API calls
- $1.00 per million (first 300 million)
- Checked Nov 8, 2026aws.amazon.com(opens source in a new tab)
- “300 million * $1.00/million”
- REST API calls
- $3.50 per million (first 333 million, US East)
- Checked Nov 8, 2026aws.amazon.com(opens source in a new tab)
- “333 million * $3.50/million”
- Free tier
- 1M REST + 1M HTTP calls/month for 12 months
- Checked Nov 8, 2026aws.amazon.com(opens source in a new tab)
- “Free Tier The Amazon API Gateway free tier includes one million API calls received for REST APIs, one million API calls received for HTTP APIs”
- Free tier credits
- Up to $200 for new AWS customers
- Checked Nov 8, 2026aws.amazon.com(opens source in a new tab)
- “Starting July 15, 2025, new AWS customers will receive up to $200 in AWS Free Tier credits”
Kong facts
4 of 4 verified- License
- Apache-2.0
- Checked Nov 1, 2026github.com(opens source in a new tab)
- “License: Apache-2.0 (Apache License 2.0).”
- Free trial
- 30 days (Konnect)
- Checked Nov 8, 2026konghq.com(opens source in a new tab)
- “[ Start for Free ] ( /products/kong-konnect/register ) Start for Free 30-Day Free Trial | no credit card required”
- Starting price
- From $25/month plus usage (Konnect Plus)
- Checked Nov 8, 2026konghq.com(opens source in a new tab)
- “From $25/month plus usage, billed monthly Start governing smaller LLM, MCP, and A2A deployments.”
- Extensibility
- Modules and plugins
- Checked Nov 8, 2026developer.konghq.com(opens source in a new tab)
- “Kong Gateway runs in front of any RESTful API and can be extended through modules and plugins.”
Pros and cons of Amazon API Gateway
- No minimum fees; you pay per call and data out
- Tight integration with Lambda, IAM and Cognito
- Supports REST, HTTP and WebSocket APIs
- Free tier of one million calls a month for new accounts
- Only runs inside AWS and is region-bound
- No polished developer portal out of the box
- Costs and configuration get complex at high volume
Pros and cons of Kong
- Open-source core under Apache 2.0
- Large plugin library for auth, rate limiting and observability
- Self-hosted, hybrid or fully managed deployment
- Many advanced plugins and the portal need a paid licence
- Konnect usage pricing has many moving parts
- More to operate than a single-binary gateway like KrakenD
Other apps to consider
TykInstead of Amazon API Gateway
Open-source gateway with a built-in developer portal, deployable across clouds.
ApigeeInstead of Amazon API Gateway
Fuller API management with portals, analytics and monetization for large API programs.
Azure API ManagementInstead of Amazon API Gateway
Microsoft's managed gateway with a developer portal and policies, the natural pick for APIs hosted on Azure.
- MuMuleSoft Anypoint Platform
Instead of Kong
For enterprises that want API management bundled with integration tooling and Flex Gateway under one Salesforce contract.
EnvoyInstead of Kong
The open-source proxy many gateways build on, configurable at runtime through xDS APIs.
TrueFoundryInstead of Kong
Purpose-built AI gateway for LLM and MCP traffic, with prompt management and a free tier for small teams.
Amazon API Gateway vs Kong: common questions
Is Amazon API Gateway better than Kong?
Amazon API Gateway suits teams building serverless or AWS-hosted backends who want a fully managed gateway billed per call. Kong suits platform teams that want an open-source gateway they can run anywhere, with an optional managed control plane. The biggest difference is lock-in: API Gateway only runs inside AWS, while Kong's Apache-2.0 core runs on Linux, Docker or Kubernetes in any environment.
Is Amazon API Gateway free?
No. Amazon API Gateway is paid, though it may offer a trial.
Is Kong free?
Yes. Kong is free, open-source software you can host yourself.
Is Amazon API Gateway or Kong open source?
Kong is open source; Amazon API Gateway is not.
Which platforms do Amazon API Gateway and Kong support?
Amazon API Gateway: Web. Kong: Web, Linux and Self-hosted.