Amazon Redshift vs Databricks
Updated November 2026 · AppBreakup editorial

Amazon Redshift
AWS's managed cloud data warehouse, available as provisioned clusters or a serverless option.

Databricks
A lakehouse platform combining data engineering, SQL warehousing and machine learning on your cloud.
The short answer
Amazon Redshift is AWS's managed SQL data warehouse, best for teams already on AWS that want analytics tied into IAM, S3 and other AWS services. Databricks is a lakehouse platform for data engineering, SQL and machine learning that runs on AWS, Azure and Google Cloud. Pick Redshift for SQL analytics inside AWS; pick Databricks for Spark, ML and multi-cloud work on open formats.
Amazon Redshift or Databricks: our take
Redshift is a classic cloud data warehouse. It stores data in columns across nodes so large SQL queries run in parallel, speaks a PostgreSQL-flavoured dialect that common BI tools support, and comes as provisioned clusters you size yourself or as Redshift Serverless. Spectrum queries files in S3 directly, and zero-ETL integrations replicate data from AWS databases. Databricks takes a lakehouse approach: data stays in open formats such as Delta Lake and Parquet in your own cloud storage, and Databricks supplies the compute and tools on top, including Spark-based data engineering, Databricks SQL warehouses, collaborative notebooks, MLflow and Unity Catalog for governance.
Cloud choice is often decisive. Redshift runs only on AWS, and its deep integration with IAM, Lake Formation, QuickSight and SageMaker is the main reason AWS-centred teams pick it. Databricks runs on AWS, Azure and Google Cloud, which suits multi-cloud organisations or teams that want to avoid being tied to one provider's warehouse.
Both bill by usage, and both can be hard to forecast. Redshift provisioned clusters start at $0.543 per hour, Serverless starts from $1.50 per hour, billing is per second with a 60-second minimum, and new Serverless users get a $300 credit for 90 days. Databricks is pay as you go with no up-front cost, measured in Databricks Units (DBUs), and on most clouds the underlying virtual machines are billed separately by your cloud provider. A free trial is available.
Redshift is the simpler choice when the job is SQL analytics and dashboards on AWS, though provisioned clusters need sizing and tuning. Databricks is more of a platform to learn and can be overkill for teams that only need BI, but it fits data engineering and data science teams that want ETL, SQL and model training in one place.
Which should you pick?
Choose Amazon Redshift if…
- Teams on AWS that want a managed SQL warehouse integrated with their other AWS services
- Serverless option bills compute per second
- Queries data in S3 directly with Spectrum
Choose Databricks if…
- Data engineering and ML teams that want SQL, Spark and model training on one platform
- Data stays in open formats in your own cloud storage
- Covers ETL, SQL analytics and machine learning in one place
About each app
What is Amazon Redshift?
Amazon Redshift is the data warehouse service from Amazon Web Services. It stores data in columns across many nodes so large SQL analytics queries run in parallel, and it speaks a PostgreSQL-flavoured dialect that most BI tools connect to. You can run it as provisioned clusters you size yourself, or as Redshift Serverless, which bills for compute by the second while it runs queries. Redshift Spectrum queries files sitting in S3, including open table formats, without loading them first, and zero-ETL integrations replicate data from AWS databases. It also ties into IAM, Lake Formation, QuickSight and SageMaker, which is the main reason AWS-centred teams choose it. It suits companies already on AWS that want SQL analytics at scale without leaving that ecosystem. It is paid, with usage-based pricing and a credit-based trial for Serverless; costs can be harder to predict than flat plans, and it runs only on AWS, so multi-cloud teams often prefer Snowflake or Databricks.
What is Databricks?
Databricks is a data and AI platform built around the lakehouse idea: data stays in open formats such as Delta Lake and Parquet in your own cloud storage, and Databricks provides the compute and tools on top. It was founded by the creators of Apache Spark, and Spark-based data engineering remains its core, alongside Databricks SQL warehouses for BI, collaborative notebooks, MLflow for machine learning, and Unity Catalog for governance. It runs on AWS, Azure and Google Cloud, and is aimed at data engineering and data science teams in mid-sized and large organisations. Pricing is pay-as-you-go in Databricks Units (DBUs), a normalised measure of processing, and on most clouds you also pay the cloud provider separately for the underlying virtual machines. A free trial is available. It is more of a platform to learn than a plain SQL warehouse, which makes it heavier than needed for teams that only want dashboards.
Side by side
| Attribute | Amazon Redshift | Databricks |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing | Paid | Paid |
| Open source | No | No |
| Self-hostable | No | No |
| Platforms | Web | Web |
| Best for | Teams on AWS that want a managed SQL warehouse integrated with their other AWS services | Data engineering and ML teams that want SQL, Spark and model training on one platform |
| Status | Active | Active |
Verified facts, compared
Facts both apps publish, checked on each vendor's own site.
| Fact | Amazon Redshift | Databricks |
|---|---|---|
| Free trial | $300 credit for 90 days | Yes |
Amazon Redshift vs Databricks pricing
Amazon Redshift: paid
- Free trial: $300 credit for 90 days source
- Serverless price: From $1.50 per hour source
- Starting price: $0.543 per hour (provisioned) source
Databricks: paid
- Free trial: Yes source
Platforms
| Platform | Amazon Redshift | Databricks |
|---|---|---|
| Web |
Amazon Redshift facts
4 of 4 verified- Free trial
- $300 credit for 90 days
- Checked Nov 8, 2026aws.amazon.com(opens source in a new tab)
- “eligible for a $300 credit, which can be used within 90 days of sign-up toward your compute and usage use.”
- Serverless price
- From $1.50 per hour
- Checked Nov 8, 2026aws.amazon.com(opens source in a new tab)
- “Redshift Provisioned starts at $0.543 per hour, while Redshift Serverless begins at $1.50 per hour.”
- Starting price
- $0.543 per hour (provisioned)
- Checked Nov 8, 2026aws.amazon.com(opens source in a new tab)
- “Redshift Provisioned starts at $0.543 per hour, while Redshift Serverless begins at $1.50 per hour.”
- Billing
- Per second, 60-second minimum
- Checked Nov 8, 2026aws.amazon.com(opens source in a new tab)
- “You pay for the workloads you run in RPU-hours on a per-second basis (with a 60-second minimum charge), including queries that access data in open file formats in Amazon S3.”
Databricks facts
4 of 4 verified- Pricing model
- Pay as you go, no up-front cost
- Checked Nov 8, 2026databricks.com(opens source in a new tab)
- “Pay as you go Databricks offers you a pay-as-you-go approach with no up-front costs.”
- Billing unit
- Databricks Unit (DBU)
- Checked Nov 8, 2026databricks.com(opens source in a new tab)
- “A Databricks Unit (DBU) is a normalized unit of processing power”
- Cloud charges
- Billed separately by your cloud provider
- Checked Nov 8, 2026databricks.com(opens source in a new tab)
- “you will still be charged by your cloud provider for resources, like compute instances, used within your account during the free trial.”
- Free trial
- Yes
- Checked Nov 8, 2026databricks.com(opens source in a new tab)
- “Your trial includes free access to the Databricks Data + AI Platform, which allows you to manage all your data, analytics and AI in one place.”
Pros and cons of Amazon Redshift
- Serverless option bills compute per second
- Queries data in S3 directly with Spectrum
- Deep integration with IAM and other AWS services
- Standard SQL that common BI tools support
- Runs only on AWS
- Usage-based pricing can be hard to forecast
- Provisioned clusters need sizing and tuning
Pros and cons of Databricks
- Data stays in open formats in your own cloud storage
- Covers ETL, SQL analytics and machine learning in one place
- Available on AWS, Azure and Google Cloud
- Billing in DBUs plus separate cloud compute charges is hard to predict
- Steeper learning curve than a pure SQL warehouse
- Overkill for teams that only need BI dashboards
Other apps to consider
Google BigQueryInstead of Amazon Redshift
Fully serverless warehouse with no clusters to size, a better fit for teams on Google Cloud.
ClickHouseInstead of Amazon Redshift
Open-source columnar database you can self-host or use as a cloud service, very fast for real-time analytics.
SnowflakeInstead of Amazon Redshift
Runs on AWS, Azure or Google Cloud with separate storage and compute, and needs less tuning.
Microsoft FabricInstead of Databricks
Spark, warehouse and Power BI on one capacity bill for teams standardised on Azure.
TrinoInstead of Databricks
Free open-source engine for SQL over your data lake and databases, run on your own clusters.
DremioInstead of Databricks
Offloads BI and ad-hoc SQL on Iceberg to a dedicated, accelerated query engine.
Amazon Redshift vs Databricks: common questions
Is Amazon Redshift better than Databricks?
Amazon Redshift is AWS's managed SQL data warehouse, best for teams already on AWS that want analytics tied into IAM, S3 and other AWS services. Databricks is a lakehouse platform for data engineering, SQL and machine learning that runs on AWS, Azure and Google Cloud. Pick Redshift for SQL analytics inside AWS; pick Databricks for Spark, ML and multi-cloud work on open formats.
Is Amazon Redshift free?
No. Amazon Redshift is paid, though it may offer a trial.
Is Databricks free?
No. Databricks is paid, though it may offer a trial.
Is Amazon Redshift or Databricks open source?
Neither is open source.
Which platforms do Amazon Redshift and Databricks support?
Amazon Redshift: Web. Databricks: Web.