AppBreakup

Azure API Management vs Kong

Updated November 2026 · AppBreakup editorial

Azure API Management logo

Azure API Management

Microsoft's managed API gateway, developer portal and policy engine on Azure.

Paid
Kong logo

Kong

Open-source API and AI gateway with a plugin ecosystem and the Konnect cloud management platform.

Open sourceSelf-hostable

The short answer

Azure API Management suits organisations already on Azure that want a managed gateway with a ready-made developer portal and ties to Entra ID and Azure Monitor. Kong suits platform teams that want an open-source gateway they can run anywhere, extended through plugins. The biggest difference is that Kong's core is free and self-hostable, while Azure's self-hosted gateway needs the Premium tier for production.

Azure API Management or Kong: our take

Azure API Management bundles three parts: a gateway that applies policies such as rate limits, quotas, caching and transforms; a management plane for importing and grouping APIs into products; and a developer portal, which is open source and customizable, where developers read docs, try calls and get keys. It imports OpenAPI, WSDL, OData, WebSocket, GraphQL and gRPC APIs. Kong Gateway is an open-source gateway under Apache-2.0 that runs on Linux, in Docker or on Kubernetes, with most features coming from a large plugin library you can extend with your own code.

Pricing models differ. Azure API Management is billed per tier: a serverless Consumption tier billed per execution, a Developer tier with no SLA for evaluation and testing, and Basic, Standard and Premium tiers billed by the hour. Kong's core is free to self-host, and the hosted Konnect control plane starts from $25/month plus usage after a 30-day trial, with enterprise pricing by quote. On both sides, the portal and governance features cost money: in Kong, many advanced plugins and the portal need a paid licence.

For hybrid setups, Azure offers a self-hosted gateway container for on-premises and multi-cloud backends, but production use requires the costly Premium tier. Kong was built for this: self-hosted, hybrid or fully managed are all options. Azure's policies are written in XML, which takes some learning; Kong is configured through plugins and has more to operate when self-hosted.

Pick Azure API Management if your stack is on Azure and you want a managed gateway and developer portal tied into Entra ID, Azure Monitor and virtual networks. Pick Kong if you want an open-source gateway that isn't tied to one cloud, plan to run on Kubernetes or on premises, or want to start free and add a managed control plane later.

Which should you pick?

Choose Azure API Management if…

  • Azure-based organisations that want a managed API gateway with a ready-made developer portal
  • Built-in developer portal with docs, test console and self-service API keys
  • Imports OpenAPI, WSDL, GraphQL and gRPC definitions

Choose Kong if…

  • Platform teams wanting a battle-tested open-source gateway with an optional managed control plane
  • You want open-source software
  • You need to host it on your own servers
  • You want a free option (Azure API Management is paid only)
  • You need Linux and Self-hosted, which Azure API Management doesn't list

About each app

What is Azure API Management?

Azure API Management is Microsoft's hosted service for publishing, securing and monitoring APIs. It combines three parts: a gateway that sits in front of your backends and applies policies such as rate limits, quotas, caching and payload transforms; a management plane where you import API definitions and group them into products; and a developer portal where outside or internal developers read docs, try calls and get keys. You can import OpenAPI, WSDL, OData, GraphQL, WebSocket and gRPC APIs, and the backends can live on Azure, on premises or in another cloud. A self-hosted gateway container lets you run the data plane closer to those backends, though in production it needs the Premium tier. It suits teams already on Azure who want API governance tied to Entra ID, Azure Monitor and virtual networks. Pricing is per tier and per unit: a serverless Consumption tier billed by request, a Developer tier for testing without an SLA, and Basic, Standard and Premium tiers (classic and v2) billed by the hour. It is managed through the Azure portal, CLI, ARM/Bicep templates or Terraform.

What is Kong?

Kong Gateway is one of the most widely deployed API gateways. It runs in front of your services to route traffic and handle authentication, rate limiting, transformations, logging and monitoring, mostly through a large library of plugins that can be extended with your own code. The core gateway is open source under Apache 2.0 and can run on Linux, in Docker or on Kubernetes through its ingress controller. Kong Inc. builds commercial layers on top: Konnect, a hosted control plane with a developer portal, analytics and service catalog, plus enterprise plugins and an AI gateway for governing LLM and MCP traffic. Teams can self-host everything, run hybrid with Kong-hosted control planes, or use fully managed gateways. Konnect has a free trial and usage-based paid plans; enterprise pricing is by quote. It suits platform teams that want a proven gateway with room to grow into full API management.

Side by side

AttributeAzure API ManagementKong
PricingPaidOpen source
Open sourceNoYes
Self-hostableNoYes
PlatformsWebWeb, Linux, Self-hosted
Best forAzure-based organisations that want a managed API gateway with a ready-made developer portalPlatform teams wanting a battle-tested open-source gateway with an optional managed control plane
StatusActiveActive

Azure API Management vs Kong pricing

Azure API Management: paid

  • Serverless tier: Consumption tier, billed per execution source
  • Developer tier: No SLA; for evaluation and testing source
Azure API Management pricing page

Kong: open source

  • License: Apache-2.0 source
  • Free trial: 30 days (Konnect) source
  • Starting price: From $25/month plus usage (Konnect Plus) source
Kong pricing page

Platforms

PlatformAzure API ManagementKong
Web
Linux
Self-hosted

Azure API Management facts

5 of 5 verified
API formats
OpenAPI, WSDL, OData, WebSocket, GraphQL, gRPC
Checked Nov 8, 2026learn.microsoft.com(opens source in a new tab)
“Including, OpenAPI, WSDL, OData definitions, Azure compute services, WebSocket, GraphQL, and gRPC backends.”
Self-hosted gateway
Yes, for on-premises and multi-cloud
Checked Nov 8, 2026azure.microsoft.com(opens source in a new tab)
“The new self-hosted gateway feature enables on-premises as well as multi-cloud deployments.”
Serverless tier
Consumption tier, billed per execution
Checked Nov 8, 2026azure.microsoft.com(opens source in a new tab)
“Lightweight and serverless version of API Management service, billed per execution”
Developer tier
No SLA; for evaluation and testing
Checked Nov 8, 2026azure.microsoft.com(opens source in a new tab)
“The Developer tier does not offer an SLA.”
Developer portal
Yes, open source and customizable
Checked Nov 8, 2026learn.microsoft.com(opens source in a new tab)
“Developer portal The open-source developer portal is an automatically generated, fully customizable website with the documentation of your APIs.”

Kong facts

4 of 4 verified
License
Apache-2.0
Checked Nov 1, 2026github.com(opens source in a new tab)
“License: Apache-2.0 (Apache License 2.0).”
Free trial
30 days (Konnect)
Checked Nov 8, 2026konghq.com(opens source in a new tab)
“[ Start for Free ] ( /products/kong-konnect/register ) Start for Free 30-Day Free Trial | no credit card required”
Starting price
From $25/month plus usage (Konnect Plus)
Checked Nov 8, 2026konghq.com(opens source in a new tab)
“From $25/month plus usage, billed monthly Start governing smaller LLM, MCP, and A2A deployments.”
Extensibility
Modules and plugins
Checked Nov 8, 2026developer.konghq.com(opens source in a new tab)
“Kong Gateway runs in front of any RESTful API and can be extended through modules and plugins.”

Pros and cons of Azure API Management

  • Built-in developer portal with docs, test console and self-service API keys
  • Imports OpenAPI, WSDL, GraphQL and gRPC definitions
  • Serverless Consumption tier for low or spiky traffic
  • Close ties to Entra ID, Azure Monitor and virtual networks
  • Self-hosted gateway in production needs the costly Premium tier
  • Developer tier has no SLA, so it can't be used for production
  • Policy configuration is XML-based and has a learning curve
  • Fits best when the rest of your stack is on Azure
More Azure API Management alternatives

Pros and cons of Kong

  • Open-source core under Apache 2.0
  • Large plugin library for auth, rate limiting and observability
  • Self-hosted, hybrid or fully managed deployment
  • Many advanced plugins and the portal need a paid licence
  • Konnect usage pricing has many moving parts
  • More to operate than a single-binary gateway like KrakenD
More Kong alternatives

Other apps to consider

  • Apigee logo
    Apigee

    Instead of Azure API Management

    Google Cloud's equivalent, with deeper API monetization and analytics, for teams moving workloads to GCP.

  • Tyk logo
    Tyk

    Instead of Azure API Management

    Open-source gateway with a built-in developer portal that self-hosts anywhere, without a Premium-tier requirement.

  • Amazon API Gateway logo
    Amazon API Gateway

    Instead of Azure API Management

    The AWS counterpart, billed per request with no instance tiers, for teams whose backends live on Lambda and other AWS services.

  • Mu
    MuleSoft Anypoint Platform

    Instead of Kong

    For enterprises that want API management bundled with integration tooling and Flex Gateway under one Salesforce contract.

  • Envoy logo
    Envoy

    Instead of Kong

    The open-source proxy many gateways build on, configurable at runtime through xDS APIs.

  • TrueFoundry logo
    TrueFoundry

    Instead of Kong

    Purpose-built AI gateway for LLM and MCP traffic, with prompt management and a free tier for small teams.

Azure API Management vs Kong: common questions

Is Azure API Management better than Kong?

Azure API Management suits organisations already on Azure that want a managed gateway with a ready-made developer portal and ties to Entra ID and Azure Monitor. Kong suits platform teams that want an open-source gateway they can run anywhere, extended through plugins. The biggest difference is that Kong's core is free and self-hostable, while Azure's self-hosted gateway needs the Premium tier for production.

Is Azure API Management free?

No. Azure API Management is paid, though it may offer a trial.

Is Kong free?

Yes. Kong is free, open-source software you can host yourself.

Is Azure API Management or Kong open source?

Kong is open source; Azure API Management is not.

Which platforms do Azure API Management and Kong support?

Azure API Management: Web. Kong: Web, Linux and Self-hosted.