AppBreakup
Submit an app

lazygit alternatives: 6 apps ranked by verified data

Facts checked Oct 25, 2026AppBreakup editorialHow we rank

Common reasons people leave lazygit: keybindings take a while to learn, and simpler history view than graphical clients. We ranked 6 alternatives by how directly each one replaces lazygit, then by reviews, real visits and how recently each app's facts were checked against its own website. gitui currently ranks first.

Quick comparison

#AppPricingOpen sourcePlatformsVerified factsScore
1gitui logogituiOpen sourceYesWindows, macOS, Linux4 of 466.5
2Tig logoTigOpen sourceYesLinux, macOS, Windows4 of 462.6
3Gitu logoGituOpen sourceYesLinux, macOS, Windows3 of 359.6
4Magit logoMagitOpen sourceYesLinux, macOS, Windows4 of 457.2
5Neogit logoNeogitOpen sourceYesLinux, macOS, Windows3 of 355.3
6Sublime Merge logoSublime MergePaidNoWindows, macOS, Linux4 of 453.6
  1. gitui logo

    1. gituiTop pick

    Best for: Terminal users on very large repositories who want a light, responsive Git UI

    Open sourceWindows, macOS, Linux

    66.5

    score / 100

    Why switch from lazygit

    A similar terminal UI written in Rust that is noticeably faster on very large repos.

    Pros

    • Very fast and memory-efficient on big repositories
    • On-screen context help instead of memorised shortcuts
    • Free, MIT-licensed, packaged for every major OS

    Cons

    • Fewer history-editing features than lazygit
    • Commit signing has known limitations
    • Terminal-only, with no visual graph
    Visit gitui Details and reviews
    How this score is calculated
    Editorial fit ×0.3100
    Reviews ×0.363
    Clicks (90 days) ×0.150
    Freshness ×0.1585
    Votes ×0.150

    0 counted reviews, 0 up and 0 down votes. Full formula

    Is gitui a good lazygit alternative?

    Verified facts

    4 of 4 verified
    License
    MIT
    Checked Oct 25, 2026github.com(opens source in a new tab)
    Language
    Rust
    Checked Oct 25, 2026github.com(opens source in a new tab)
    Controls
    Keyboard only, with context help
    Checked Oct 25, 2026github.com(opens source in a new tab)
    Windows install
    winget, Scoop, Chocolatey
    Checked Oct 25, 2026github.com(opens source in a new tab)
  2. Tig logo

    2. Tig

    Best for: Command-line users who want a quick way to browse history, diffs and blame

    Open sourceLinux, macOS, Windows

    62.6

    score / 100

    Why switch from lazygit

    Lighter and older, ideal if you mostly browse history and blame in the terminal.

    Pros

    • Tiny, fast and widely packaged
    • Excellent log, diff and blame browsing
    • Works as a pager for other Git commands

    Cons

    • Limited write operations; no interactive rebase UI
    • Dated look and Vim-style keys
    • Needs the Git command line for most changes
    Visit Tig Details and reviews
    How this score is calculated
    Editorial fit ×0.387
    Reviews ×0.363
    Clicks (90 days) ×0.150
    Freshness ×0.1585
    Votes ×0.150

    0 counted reviews, 0 up and 0 down votes. Full formula

    Is Tig a good lazygit alternative?

    Verified facts

    4 of 4 verified
    License
    GPL-2.0
    Checked Oct 25, 2026github.com(opens source in a new tab)
    Type
    ncurses text-mode interface
    Checked Oct 25, 2026jonas.github.io(opens source in a new tab)
    Staging
    Chunk-level staging
    Checked Oct 25, 2026jonas.github.io(opens source in a new tab)
    Pager mode
    Yes
    Checked Oct 25, 2026jonas.github.io(opens source in a new tab)
  3. Gitu logo

    3. Gitu

    Best for: Magit fans who want the same workflow in a plain terminal

    Open sourceLinux, macOS, Windows

    59.6

    score / 100

    Why switch from lazygit

    Uses Magit-style keybindings, good if you know Magit but do not use Emacs.

    Pros

    • Magit-style keys and status view outside Emacs
    • Line and hunk staging from the diff
    • Free, MIT-licensed and lightweight

    Cons

    • Still implementing many Magit features
    • Smaller community than lazygit
    • Keyboard-only, with a learning curve for non-Magit users
    Visit Gitu Details and reviews
    How this score is calculated
    Editorial fit ×0.377
    Reviews ×0.363
    Clicks (90 days) ×0.150
    Freshness ×0.1585
    Votes ×0.150

    0 counted reviews, 0 up and 0 down votes. Full formula

    Is Gitu a good lazygit alternative?

    Verified facts

    3 of 3 verified
    License
    MIT
    Checked Oct 25, 2026github.com(opens source in a new tab)
    Inspired by
    Magit
    Checked Oct 25, 2026github.com(opens source in a new tab)
    Scope
    Implementing Magit core features over time
    Checked Oct 25, 2026github.com(opens source in a new tab)
  4. Magit logo

    4. Magit

    Best for: Emacs users who want the fastest, most complete keyboard-driven Git workflow

    Open sourceLinux, macOS, Windows

    57.2

    score / 100

    Why switch from lazygit

    The deepest keyboard-driven Git interface, if you are willing to use Emacs.

    Pros

    • Covers almost all of Git through discoverable key menus
    • Line-level staging and painless interactive rebase
    • Free software with a long, stable history

    Cons

    • Requires Emacs, which is a big learning investment
    • Can be slow on Windows and huge repositories
    • No graphical commit graph
    Visit Magit Details and reviews
    How this score is calculated
    Editorial fit ×0.369
    Reviews ×0.363
    Clicks (90 days) ×0.150
    Freshness ×0.1585
    Votes ×0.150

    0 counted reviews, 0 up and 0 down votes. Full formula

    Is Magit a good lazygit alternative?

    Verified facts

    4 of 4 verified
    License
    GPL-3.0
    Checked Oct 25, 2026github.com(opens source in a new tab)
    Runs in
    Emacs
    Checked Oct 25, 2026github.com(opens source in a new tab)
    Interface
    Text-based UI with mnemonic keys
    Checked Oct 25, 2026magit.vc(opens source in a new tab)
    Maintainers
    Jonas Bernoulli, Kyle Meyer, Noam Postavsky
    Checked Oct 25, 2026magit.vc(opens source in a new tab)
  5. Neogit logo

    5. Neogit

    Best for: Neovim users who want a Magit-style Git workflow in their editor

    Open sourceLinux, macOS, Windows

    55.3

    score / 100

    Why switch from lazygit

    A Magit-like Git interface built into Neovim instead of a separate terminal app.

    Pros

    • Familiar Magit-style status view and menus
    • Line and hunk staging inside Neovim
    • Free, MIT-licensed and configurable in Lua

    Cons

    • Not as complete as Magit
    • Only for Neovim users
    • Behaviour can change between releases
    Visit Neogit Details and reviews
    How this score is calculated
    Editorial fit ×0.363
    Reviews ×0.363
    Clicks (90 days) ×0.150
    Freshness ×0.1585
    Votes ×0.150

    0 counted reviews, 0 up and 0 down votes. Full formula

    Is Neogit a good lazygit alternative?

    Verified facts

    3 of 3 verified
    License
    MIT
    Checked Oct 25, 2026github.com(opens source in a new tab)
    Runs in
    Neovim
    Checked Oct 25, 2026github.com(opens source in a new tab)
    Inspired by
    Magit
    Checked Oct 25, 2026github.com(opens source in a new tab)
  6. Sublime Merge logo

    6. Sublime Merge

    Best for: Keyboard-driven developers who want the fastest possible Git GUI on any OS

    PaidWindows, macOS, Linux

    53.6

    score / 100

    Why switch from lazygit

    A graphical client with the same keyboard-first speed and a visual diff.

    Pros

    • Extremely fast, even on large repositories
    • Line-level staging and a good built-in merge tool
    • Runs on Windows, macOS and Linux

    Cons

    • No pull-request or hosting-service integrations
    • Licence required for continued use
    • Spartan interface without a rich branch overview
    Visit Sublime Merge Details and reviews
    How this score is calculated
    Editorial fit ×0.357
    Reviews ×0.363
    Clicks (90 days) ×0.150
    Freshness ×0.1585
    Votes ×0.150

    0 counted reviews, 0 up and 0 down votes. Full formula

    Is Sublime Merge a good lazygit alternative?

    Verified facts

    4 of 4 verified
    Licence model
    Free to evaluate, licence required
    Checked Oct 25, 2026sublimemerge.com(opens source in a new tab)
    Evaluation limit
    No enforced time limit
    Checked Oct 25, 2026sublimemerge.com(opens source in a new tab)
    Platforms
    Windows, macOS, Linux
    Checked Oct 25, 2026sublimemerge.com(opens source in a new tab)
    Syntax highlighting
    40+ languages
    Checked Oct 25, 2026sublimemerge.com(opens source in a new tab)

The best lazygit alternative for…

The highest-ranked app in this list for each need.

gitui logo

Best lazygit alternative for most people

gitui

A similar terminal UI written in Rust that is noticeably faster on very large repos.

Tig logo

Best lazygit alternative for a free option

Tig

Lighter and older, ideal if you mostly browse history and blame in the terminal.

Gitu logo

Best lazygit alternative for open source

Gitu

Uses Magit-style keybindings, good if you know Magit but do not use Emacs.

Magit logo

Best lazygit alternative for Mac

Magit

The deepest keyboard-driven Git interface, if you are willing to use Emacs.

Neogit logo

Best lazygit alternative for Windows

Neogit

A Magit-like Git interface built into Neovim instead of a separate terminal app.

Sublime Merge logo

Best lazygit alternative for Linux

Sublime Merge

A graphical client with the same keyboard-first speed and a visual diff.

lazygit alternatives: common questions

What is the best alternative to lazygit?

gitui ranks first right now. A similar terminal UI written in Rust that is noticeably faster on very large repos. Tig and Gitu follow it in our ranking.

Is there a free alternative to lazygit?

Yes. gitui (open source), Tig (open source), Gitu (open source) and Magit (open source) have a free option. Check each app's verified facts for current plan limits.

Is there an open-source alternative to lazygit?

Yes: gitui, Tig, Gitu and Magit, plus 1 more in the list above.

Which lazygit alternatives work on Linux?

gitui, Tig, Gitu, Magit and Neogit run on Linux.

Why do people switch from lazygit?

The complaints we hear most: keybindings take a while to learn; simpler history view than graphical clients; no built-in pull-request integration.

How is this list ranked?

Every app is scored with the same published formula: how directly it replaces lazygit, reviews (weighted by verification), visits from AppBreakup, how recently its facts were checked against its own website, and reader votes.