Quick comparison # App Pricing Verified price Open source Platforms Verified facts Score 1 Proxmox VEOpen source €120/year per CPU socket Yes Self-hosted, Web 4 of 4 68.8 2 Xc XCP-ngOpen source — Yes Self-hosted 4 of 4 64.8 3 OpenStackOpen source — Yes Self-hosted, Linux 5 of 5 61.8 4 Apache CloudStackOpen source — Yes Self-hosted, Web 4 of 4 59.4
1 Best for: Businesses leaving VMware and home-lab users who want VMs and containers with a web UI
Open source Self-hostable Self-hosted, Web
Why switch from oVirt
Debian-based and easier to install, with KVM, containers and an optional paid support subscription.
Pros Free to use with all features, no edition limits VMs (KVM) and containers (LXC) on one platform Built-in clustering, HA, backups, ZFS and Ceph Simple per-socket subscriptions with no per-core licensingCons Enterprise update repository and support need a paid subscription Limited multi-tenant self-service compared with OpenStack Support tickets are capped per year on lower tiersHow this score is calculated Editorial fit ×0.3 100
Reviews ×0.3 63
Clicks (90 days) ×0.15 0
Freshness ×0.15 100
Votes ×0.1 50
0 counted reviews, 0 up and 0 down votes. Full formula
2 Xc Best for: Teams wanting free enterprise-grade VM hosting, especially those leaving VMware
Open source Self-hostable Self-hosted
Why switch from oVirt
Open-source Xen platform with Xen Orchestra and commercial support available.
Pros Free and open source, Linux Foundation hosted Xen Orchestra web UI with built-in backup Direct VM import from VMware ESXi Commercial support available from VatesCons Xen ecosystem is smaller than KVM's Not a full self-service IaaS like OpenStack Some Xen Orchestra conveniences are tied to paid plansHow this score is calculated Editorial fit ×0.3 87
Reviews ×0.3 63
Clicks (90 days) ×0.15 0
Freshness ×0.15 100
Votes ×0.1 50
0 counted reviews, 0 up and 0 down votes. Full formula
3 Best for: Telcos, hosting providers and large enterprises building their own AWS-style cloud
Open source Self-hostable Self-hosted, Linux
Why switch from oVirt
Fits teams that need a full private cloud with self-service tenants rather than a VM manager.
Pros Free, Apache-licensed and vendor-neutral Covers VMs, bare metal, storage and networking behind one set of APIs Proven at very large scale, with many commercial distributions Modular, so you deploy only the services you needCons Complex to deploy, operate and upgrade Needs a dedicated team or a paid distribution for production Too heavy for a handful of serversHow this score is calculated Editorial fit ×0.3 77
Reviews ×0.3 63
Clicks (90 days) ×0.15 0
Freshness ×0.15 100
Votes ×0.1 50
0 counted reviews, 0 up and 0 down votes. Full formula
4 Best for: Hosting providers and MSPs who need a multi-tenant IaaS cloud without OpenStack's complexity
Open source Self-hostable Self-hosted, Web
Why switch from oVirt
Open-source cloud platform that manages KVM, VMware and Xen pools with multi-tenancy.
Pros Turnkey stack with UI, API, accounts and billing data built in Works with VMware, KVM and XenServer hosts EC2 and S3-compatible API for hybrid setups Free under the Apache License 2.0Cons Smaller ecosystem and vendor community than OpenStack Commercial support only through third parties More than a small business with a few servers needsHow this score is calculated Editorial fit ×0.3 69
Reviews ×0.3 63
Clicks (90 days) ×0.15 0
Freshness ×0.15 100
Votes ×0.1 50
0 counted reviews, 0 up and 0 down votes. Full formula