AppBreakup
Submit an app

Trigger.dev alternatives: 5 apps ranked by verified data

Facts checked Nov 8, 2026AppBreakup editorialHow we rankAll workflow orchestration tools

Top picks

  • Inngest logo

    Best overall

    Inngest

    Starting price: $99/month (Pro)

  • Temporal logo

    Best free option

    Temporal

    Starting price: $50 per million actions

  • Prefect logo

    Best open source

    Prefect

    Starter plan: $100/month

Common reasons people leave Trigger.dev: typeScript-first; Python only runs via an extension inside TypeScript tasks, and usage-based compute billing makes costs harder to predict than a flat fee. We ranked 5 alternatives by how directly each one replaces Trigger.dev, then by reviews, real visits and how recently each app's facts were checked against its own website. Inngest currently ranks first.

Quick comparison

#AppPricingVerified priceOpen sourcePlatformsVerified factsScore
1Inngest logoInngestOpen source$99/month (Pro)NoWeb, Self-hosted4 of 468.8
2Temporal logoTemporalOpen source$50 per million actionsNoWeb, Self-hosted5 of 564.8
3Prefect logoPrefectOpen source$100/monthYesWeb, Linux, macOS +25 of 561.8
4Apache Airflow logoApache AirflowOpen source—YesLinux, Self-hosted, Web5 of 559.4
5Windmill logoWindmillOpen source—YesWeb, Self-hosted4 of 450.0
  1. Inngest logo

    1. InngestTop pick

    Best for: Web and serverless teams that want reliable multi-step background functions without managing queues

    Open sourceWeb, Self-hosted

    68.8

    score / 100

    Why switch from Trigger.dev

    Similar durable step functions for TypeScript and Python, triggered by events and run on your own endpoints.

    Pros

    • Runs functions on your existing serverless or server deployment
    • Built-in concurrency, throttling and rate-limit controls per function
    • Free tier with a sizeable monthly execution allowance
    • Can be self-hosted

    Cons

    • Paid plans jump to a three-figure monthly base price
    • Execution-based pricing can climb quickly for step-heavy workflows
    • Fewer SDK languages than Temporal
    Visit Inngest Details and reviews
    How this score is calculated
    Editorial fit ×0.3100
    Reviews ×0.363
    Clicks (90 days) ×0.150
    Freshness ×0.15100
    Votes ×0.150

    0 counted reviews, 0 up and 0 down votes. Full formula

    Is Inngest a good Trigger.dev alternative?

    Verified facts

    4 of 4 verified
    Free plan
    50,000 executions/month
    Checked Nov 8, 2026inngest.com(opens source in a new tab)
    Starting price
    $99/month (Pro)
    Checked Nov 8, 2026inngest.com(opens source in a new tab)
    Self-hosting
    Yes
    Checked Nov 8, 2026inngest.com(opens source in a new tab)
    Maximum run length
    30 days (Free) to 366 days (Business)
    Checked Nov 8, 2026inngest.com(opens source in a new tab)
  2. Temporal logo

    2. Temporal

    Best for: Engineering teams building business-critical, long-running processes in several languages

    Open sourceWeb, Self-hosted

    64.8

    score / 100

    Why switch from Trigger.dev

    Mature durable execution engine with SDKs in many languages, for teams that outgrow TypeScript-only tooling.

    Pros

    • MIT-licensed server you can run anywhere
    • Official SDKs for eight languages
    • Handles retries, timers and long waits without custom state machines
    • Detailed per-workflow event history for debugging

    Cons

    • Steep learning curve, including rules about deterministic workflow code
    • You still run and scale your own worker processes
    • Self-hosting the cluster and its database is a significant ops job
    Visit Temporal Details and reviews
    How this score is calculated
    Editorial fit ×0.387
    Reviews ×0.363
    Clicks (90 days) ×0.150
    Freshness ×0.15100
    Votes ×0.150

    0 counted reviews, 0 up and 0 down votes. Full formula

    Is Temporal a good Trigger.dev alternative?

    Verified facts

    5 of 5 verified
    License
    MIT
    Checked Nov 8, 2026github.com(opens source in a new tab)
    Free credits
    $150 for 90 days
    Checked Nov 8, 2026temporal.io(opens source in a new tab)
    Starting price
    $50 per million actions
    Checked Nov 8, 2026temporal.io(opens source in a new tab)
    Self-hosting
    Yes
    Checked Nov 8, 2026temporal.io(opens source in a new tab)
    SDK languages
    Go, Java, Python, TypeScript, .NET, PHP, Ruby, Rust
    Checked Nov 8, 2026temporal.io(opens source in a new tab)
  3. Prefect logo

    3. Prefect

    Best for: Python teams who want orchestration without rewriting code into a separate DAG framework

    Open sourceSelf-hostableWeb, Linux, macOS, Windows, Self-hosted

    61.8

    score / 100

    Why switch from Trigger.dev

    Python-first orchestration with a hosted control plane, better suited to data pipelines than app jobs.

    Pros

    • Plain Python with a decorator, little new to learn
    • Free hosted Hobby tier and a self-hostable open source server
    • Runs on your own compute, Kubernetes or serverless

    Cons

    • Free cloud tier is limited to 2 users and 5 deployments
    • Smaller integration ecosystem than Airflow
    • Paid plans jump quickly from a flat fee to per-user pricing
    Visit Prefect Details and reviews
    How this score is calculated
    Editorial fit ×0.377
    Reviews ×0.363
    Clicks (90 days) ×0.150
    Freshness ×0.15100
    Votes ×0.150

    0 counted reviews, 0 up and 0 down votes. Full formula

    Is Prefect a good Trigger.dev alternative?

    Verified facts

    5 of 5 verified
    License
    Apache-2.0
    Checked Nov 2, 2026github.com(opens source in a new tab)
    Free plan
    Hobby, free forever
    Checked Nov 8, 2026prefect.io(opens source in a new tab)
    Free plan limits
    2 users, 5 deployments
    Checked Nov 8, 2026prefect.io(opens source in a new tab)
    Starter plan
    $100/month
    Checked Nov 8, 2026prefect.io(opens source in a new tab)
    Team plan
    $100 per user/month
    Checked Nov 8, 2026prefect.io(opens source in a new tab)
  4. Apache Airflow logo

    4. Apache Airflow

    Best for: Data engineering teams that want a proven, free orchestrator with a huge integration ecosystem

    Open sourceSelf-hostableLinux, Self-hosted, Web

    59.4

    score / 100

    Why switch from Trigger.dev

    The standard open-source scheduler for batch data pipelines if your jobs are mostly ETL.

    Pros

    • Free and open source with a very large community
    • Pipelines are plain Python, so they can be generated dynamically
    • Hundreds of ready-made operators for clouds and data tools
    • Managed versions available from several cloud providers

    Cons

    • Running scheduler, workers and metadata database yourself takes real ops effort
    • Local development and testing are clunkier than in newer tools like Prefect or Dagster
    • No official hosted service from the Apache project itself
    Visit Apache Airflow Details and reviews
    How this score is calculated
    Editorial fit ×0.369
    Reviews ×0.363
    Clicks (90 days) ×0.150
    Freshness ×0.15100
    Votes ×0.150

    0 counted reviews, 0 up and 0 down votes. Full formula

    Is Apache Airflow a good Trigger.dev alternative?

    Verified facts

    5 of 5 verified
    License
    Apache-2.0
    Checked Nov 1, 2026github.com(opens source in a new tab)
    Pipeline language
    Python
    Checked Nov 8, 2026airflow.apache.org(opens source in a new tab)
    Web UI
    Yes
    Checked Nov 8, 2026airflow.apache.org(opens source in a new tab)
    Cloud integrations
    GCP, AWS, Azure and more
    Checked Nov 8, 2026airflow.apache.org(opens source in a new tab)
    Maintainer
    Apache Software Foundation
    Checked Nov 8, 2026airflow.apache.org(opens source in a new tab)
  5. Windmill logo

    5. Windmill

    Best for: Engineering teams that want scripts, workflows and internal UIs in one self-hosted platform

    Open sourceSelf-hostableWeb, Self-hosted

    50.0

    score / 100

    Why switch from Trigger.dev

    Open-source and self-hostable runner for TypeScript and Python scripts, scheduled jobs and multi-step workflows with a built-in UI.

    Pros

    • Scripts, workflows and apps in one place
    • Supports many languages including Python and TypeScript
    • Free self-hosted edition with unlimited executions

    Cons

    • Built for developers, not business users
    • App builder is less polished than Retool's
    • Enterprise features need a paid licence
    Visit Windmill Details and reviews
    How this score is calculated
    Editorial fit ×0.338
    Reviews ×0.363
    Clicks (90 days) ×0.150
    Freshness ×0.15100
    Votes ×0.150

    0 counted reviews, 0 up and 0 down votes. Full formula

    Is Windmill a good Trigger.dev alternative?

    Verified facts

    4 of 4 verified
    Community edition
    Free, unlimited executions
    Checked Nov 8, 2026windmill.dev(opens source in a new tab)
    Script languages
    Python, TypeScript, Go, PHP, Bash, SQL
    Checked Nov 8, 2026windmill.dev(opens source in a new tab)
    Free guests
    100 per 30 days
    Checked Nov 8, 2026windmill.dev(opens source in a new tab)
    Self-hosting
    Yes
    Checked Nov 8, 2026windmill.dev(opens source in a new tab)

The best Trigger.dev alternative for…

The highest-ranked app in this list for each need.

Inngest logo

Best Trigger.dev alternative for most people

Inngest

Similar durable step functions for TypeScript and Python, triggered by events and run on your own endpoints.

Temporal logo

Best Trigger.dev alternative for a free option

Temporal

Mature durable execution engine with SDKs in many languages, for teams that outgrow TypeScript-only tooling.

Prefect logo

Best Trigger.dev alternative for open source

Prefect

Python-first orchestration with a hosted control plane, better suited to data pipelines than app jobs.

Apache Airflow logo

Best Trigger.dev alternative for self-hosting

Apache Airflow

The standard open-source scheduler for batch data pipelines if your jobs are mostly ETL.

Prefect logo

Best Trigger.dev alternative for Mac

Prefect

Python-first orchestration with a hosted control plane, better suited to data pipelines than app jobs.

Prefect logo

Best Trigger.dev alternative for Windows

Prefect

Python-first orchestration with a hosted control plane, better suited to data pipelines than app jobs.

Prefect logo

Best Trigger.dev alternative for Linux

Prefect

Python-first orchestration with a hosted control plane, better suited to data pipelines than app jobs.

Windmill logo

Best Trigger.dev alternative for working in the browser

Windmill

Open-source and self-hostable runner for TypeScript and Python scripts, scheduled jobs and multi-step workflows with a built-in UI.

Trigger.dev alternatives: common questions

What is the best alternative to Trigger.dev?

Inngest ranks first right now. Similar durable step functions for TypeScript and Python, triggered by events and run on your own endpoints. Temporal and Prefect follow it in our ranking.

Trigger.dev vs Inngest: what's the difference?

Both Trigger.dev and Inngest are free and open source. Verified prices: Trigger.dev $10/month (Hobby), Inngest $99/month (Pro). Both run on Web.

Is Trigger.dev free?

Trigger.dev is free and open source. Free plan: $5/month of credits; Starting price: $10/month (Hobby). Checked on Trigger.dev's own site, November 2026.

How much do Trigger.dev alternatives cost?

Verified prices for the top-ranked Trigger.dev alternatives: Inngest, $99/month (Pro); Temporal, $50 per million actions; Prefect, $100/month. Each price was checked on the app's own site; see each card below for the date and source.

Is there a free alternative to Trigger.dev?

Yes. Inngest (open source), Temporal (open source), Prefect (open source) and Apache Airflow (open source) have a free option. Check each app's verified facts for current plan limits.

Is there an open-source alternative to Trigger.dev?

Yes: Prefect, Apache Airflow and Windmill. Prefect, Apache Airflow and Windmill can also be self-hosted.

Which Trigger.dev alternatives work on Linux?

Prefect and Apache Airflow run on Linux.

Why do people switch from Trigger.dev?

The complaints we hear most: typeScript-first; Python only runs via an extension inside TypeScript tasks; usage-based compute billing makes costs harder to predict than a flat fee; free plan has 1-day log retention.

How is this list ranked?

Every app is scored with the same published formula: how directly it replaces Trigger.dev, reviews (weighted by verification), visits from AppBreakup, how recently its facts were checked against its own website, and reader votes.